Stolen
Stolen
Painting \ Figure | 11/16/06 @792 |
yumedust |
critiques (28) |
views (8066)
Do not copy, modify, distribute or sell the whole or parts of the image above without permission of the creator. More.
Description
Hi everyone! Before I explain the piece I wanted to thank those who voted for me for the elite voting. I really appreciate it so much and I'm very honored to be set as elite here! ^o^The story behind this piece is kind of strange, it’s about a really weird dream I had recently. The dream was that the heart of a boy was stolen by a witch, and it had to be returned to him. I can't for the life of me remember his name, but I was suddenly terrified beyond belief when I heard it. It's really all in pieces but I remember seeing the boy, and he was beautiful, almost angelic, with the saddest downhearted and absent look on his face, but a second later his expression changed just the slightest and he looked perfectly alert and completely mad, and I understood why I feared him. After his heart was stolen, he turned into a monster.
I can't really explain anything else about the boy, I think he is fairly young... 16 maybe? He looked that way. I know he looks girly, but I saw him as very beautiful before he turned mad. I gave him a locket in the shape of a heart, because even though I can't remember, I think part of him was still searching for his.
Photoshop CS2 / Painter 7 / Wacom Intuos3
C&C very much appreciated... thanks!
Vote statisticsRecent: 0 votes, 0 pointsTotal: 36 votes, 294 points |
Cast your voteYou have to be logged in to voteVoting? Read the faq |
OptionsNone |
Additional Downloads
details! |
Comments (28)
Comment
To write a comment you need to be logged in
If you're not a registered member, click here to sign up.Reviews (0) beta
Write a review
To write a review you need to be logged in
If you're not a registered member, click here to sign up.Search the site
Found a rip-off? Report it!
Copyright © 2000-2008 All rights reserved
Read the Terms of use and Privacy Statement.
This site is a property of Brothers in art For more information and support, contact .
Copyright © 2000-2008 All rights reserved
This site is a property of Brothers in art For more information and support, contact .



11/16/06 @806
11/16/06 @809
kudos +9 of 9 for you =D
11/16/06 @809
11/16/06 @842
11/16/06 @854
However this image has the same problem with most images of this genre - the massive backstory is told at the description section instead of telling it in the image. Cut in the chest, cliche. Fairy faced characters with luminous qualities, cliche. Holding a piece of jewelry/knife/amulet/etc, cliche. None of those really cut it in the storytelling.. they are so used and they're too vague hints to tell the story well enough.
Only after reading the description could I understand the story, and only after that the cut in the chest and the locket started to really make sense. I guess the problem is partially in the attitude that "yes I can just make a character posing and pretend it tells a story", instead of drawing the beat of the story where, say, the witch steals his heart or something. It's all fine to write long descriptions as it's possible here, but at some point of your career you won't have that oppoturnity..
But that's just my personal opinion, and like I said, nice technique. I'm not saying I could get even to this stage with characters, so maybe I'm not the right guy to judge, but personally I can't understand why people wouldn't bother telling the story properly, seeing that their technique would be good enough to do it. (And this doesn't apply to just this piece, I could say the same to most of the artists doing this genre)
11/16/06 @937
11/16/06 @995
11/17/06 @034
11/17/06 @088
Crow, i kind of know what you mean, though as i said in the description, i don't remember much about the dream, all i really remember visually is him, and i don't want to make something up because i wanted to just paint him the way i saw him.
if you think it's cliche that may just be a difference in opinion, personally i wouldn't want a book cover to give away the entire book for me, i'd rather read it. i think trying to explain too much in an image would make it too cluttered.
thanks for your comment though
11/17/06 @089
However, I think this is a quite lovely painting - there are some anatomy erros, but those can also be seen as stylized which means it doesn't harm the painting as a whole and so I am giving you 10/10
11/17/06 @407
11/17/06 @440
11/17/06 @462
was this a book cover? if it was, you forgot to mention it. I thought this was a gallery piece. A book cover exists to arouse the interest of a potential reader - the cover exists for the book. In a gallery piece like this, it's quite the opposite, it should be the image that tells the story.
I agree that you shouldn't try to include everything in one image. However, I would think it smarter to try to depict an event that tells the story instead of just painting a character posing like here. Actually, so many pieces of this genre contain a character posing and the only thing that varies is whether the person is holding a knife or jewel or whatever, get my point? The storytelling relies heavily on small clues like a cut on chest that could be read in thousand ways - not so good if you are trying to tell a specific story.
I was tempted to post comments like this some time ago but managed to shut up back then. Now I couldn't, and this is in no way anything personal, this applies to a lot of stuff. Just saying my opinion.
As for the cliches... observe this genre. All that stuff has been done to death. Personally I would at least try to be more original.. it's hard because artists like Linda Bergkvist set the bar quite high, but you gotta try.
11/17/06 @559
11/17/06 @570
This wasn't a book cover, I was just using that as an analogy. The story was actually a dream, the only part I could accurately recall was the boy himself, I really didn't want to paint an event because I can't remember anything that really happened. (I'm sure anyone can understand this, I can usually never remember anything about my dreams after I wake up!) All I remember clearly is the boy, he's all I wanted to recreate. In light of that, a simple portrait worked fine. I also like when people can come to their own conclusions of what my image is about before reading my descriptions.
I'm not trying to completely disagree with you or tell you you're wrong, I just have a different taste. I like simple portraits, to me just facial expressions are enough to draw me in. Though if I was doing this for a client and they wished for me to tell the story in the image, I may have gone about it differently, but this one was for me, and I wanted a portrait
Thank you very much for your comment, I'm grateful you did share your opinion with me. In the future I'd like to try a "scene" type image, since it's true that I don't do that often enough :3
11/17/06 @599
11/17/06 @688
thats not saying you did a great work... i got painting like these on my walls, these are cliché too , but beautiful nonetheless.
thats my personnal opinion but i think one day, when you will be more experienced, you will be able to create painting like this one, but with the touch of originality making it stands apart.
its not really a critic for me... its more like... one way to get from good work to trully unique et personnal style standing out of the rest...
keep it up, you are so young and yet able to paint so well, its amazing
+9 (because its awesome, and +10 reserved for the mastery i was explaining
11/17/06 @914
11/17/06 @948
11/17/06 @974
i'm liking the technique, i'm liking the textures. composition, the slight backlight and esp the face
i'd work a bit more on the shoulders and upper parts of the arms, they're looking a bit too round and sulky
11/18/06 @862
11/18/06 @894
11/19/06 @431
Regarding the story, I would recommend you get a hold of Hans Christiaan Anderson's "The Snow Queen", as I think you would find that an interesting read if you have not.
11/19/06 @471
thanks everyone ^^
11/21/06 @107
12/22/06 @173
02/26/07 @962
06/16/07 @943